TUDOR PLACE: From Joakim Book at the at Mises Wire.
“Eighty-five percent of human energy usage comes from burning things. Either plants or trees grown in a geologically recent past or plants or trees (and decomposed animals) from ancient times. Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, etc.—all the things that occupy a climate-conscious citizen, activist, or politician’s dreams—are frizzles around the edges.”
TUDOR PLACE: Greta Thunberg notwithstanding, THIS WILL NOT CHANGE OVERNIGHT. As Book points out:
“Renewables don’t power our societies, they’re not about to any time soon, and the fact that they’re not isn’t a policy choice—or “greedy capitalism” preventing this utopian (dystopian) vision.”
TUDOR PLACE: Book then quotes Vaclav Smil, an energy VISIONARY I first started reading in 2006:
“We are a fossil-fueled civilization whose technical and scientific advances, quality of life, and prosperity rest on the combustion of huge quantities of fossil carbon, and we cannot simply walk away away from this critical determinant of our fortunes in a few decades, never mind years.”
TUDOR PLACE: Indeed, as I’ve often pointed out, A GREEN ECONOMY INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDOUT IS A TWENTY YEAR PROJECT THAT WILL REQUIRE GREATER USE OF HYDROCARBONS THAN EVER.
Back to Book:
“To hammer home the “renewable revolutions are impossible” point, let’s use the poster child for renewables, Germany. Here is its energy use over the last half century:

“Let me know if you can spot Germany’s revolutionary Energiewende in the early 2010s.”
More Book:
“At great expense and inconvenience, the world can indeed increase its use of solar and wind—but remember: they destabilize grids and constitute a vanishingly small portion of world energy needs. To replace what we need, and accommodate growth for the billions globally who scrape by on a minimum of energy, the IEA says we must add solar and wind capacity at a vertiginous rate, never before achieved, at way faster than their own forecasts.”
TUDOR PLACE: Who after reading a passage, such as this cannot help but conclude that RENEWABLES as part of CLIMATE CHANGE DOCTRINE are anything more than that feature of the WOKE CREED meant to “CANCEL” HYDROCARBONS?
As for ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION, Book has this to say:
“Green electricity sources, because of the unpredictable load that makes them unsuitable for modern civilization, have expanded in consort with natural gas because the dirty secret of the former is that they require rapidly available backup power—for which the latter is the convenient choice.”
TUDOR PLACE: And tying in the POLITICO-RELIGIOUS ANGLE, this:
“Because all things “carbon” are considered bad, politicians, journalists, and the Greta Thunbergs of the world have done everything in their power to sway more people into putting solar panels on their roofs and electric vehicles in their garages. That strains an already fragile grid by adding more demand and another variable supply: crucially, it requires lots more nickel, palladium, and silver—with Russia among the world’s largest supplier for those key commodities.”
TUDOR PLACE: Which is not to DEMONIZE SOLAR PANELS OR EV’S PER SE. It’s just that they’re neither UNIVERSALLY APPLICABLE AT THIS STAGE or WITHOUT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.
Book concludes with this:
“It’s becoming increasingly clear, to more and more people, that withdrawing from fossil fuels “for environmental reasons” is not a choice. A society and a world of 8 billion people more advanced than that powered by a horse and buggy, cannot do without the explosive power of fossil fuels.”
TUDOR PLACE: AT LEAST NOT FOR NOW.
Here’s the whole piece if you’d like to read it though I think I’ve distilled its essence.
Lighting the Gas Under European Feet: How Politicians and Journalists Get Energy So Wrong