And here’s why:
From the Epoch Times:
“Inequality is an intractable problem that has plagued every society in history. Slavery in the United States and the treatment of indigenous peoples there and in Canada are examples of inequality that stem from a lack of opportunity imbedded in the historical development of these two countries.
“When it comes to rectifying such legacies, the principle of equal opportunity provides the fairest and most sustainable path forward. This cornerstone of a properly functioning meritocracy fosters self-determination and autonomy at both the individual and community level, resulting in a perpetual social flourishing.
“The equity doctrine, on the other hand, prioritizes equality of outcome as a way to redistribute wealth across demographics. This pillar of socialist theory is currently promoted as the solution to many of society’s ills.”
TUDOR PLACE: As indicated above, equality of opportunity goes hand in hand with the principle of SELF-DETERMINATION found in democratic/republican societies. Equity of outcome is SOCIALISTIC, full stop. Unless I’m missing something, the majority of voters in the US don’t want socialism. Many aren’t even comfortable with a social democratic welfare state based on a firm social contract.
The aggrieved always want socialism, but all it results in — and we have this from history, NOT THEORY — is stagnation, destruction of incentive, hypocrisy and a new set of elites who while touting Marxist theory as gospel won’t hesitate to make use of market mechanisms as needed. In other words, full-blown socialism is merely ANOTHER RACKET.
On the other hand, a meritocratic society — by rewarding excellence — enables itself to advance in line with its maximum capabilities.
Here’s the entire piece:
Tudor Place 